Document accessibility from intake to acceptance

All guides

PDF/UA remediation, accessible forms and a batch process with traceable files, measured effort and human review.

Newton & Carter. Published November 7, 2026; updated November 9, 2026. Version 1.1.

Inventory and classify the backlog

Record each original file hash, page count, source format, scan quality, tables, figures, form fields, language and owner. Group recurring templates and separate high-risk files before estimating capacity.

Prove a representative batch

Select samples across the risk groups. Record actual handling time, OCR/tagging effort, validator results, manual review and rework. Use that measured batch to scope volume, staffing and schedule; a small example does not establish production throughput.

Repair the source and preserve the evidence

Prefer the editable source when available. Repair reading order, headings, lists, tables, alternatives, links and form labels. Preserve original and repaired hashes with the validator/version, unresolved findings and review record.

Convert the task into an accessible webform

Map PDF fields to labelled controls, conditional steps, instructions, validation and confirmation. Scope uploads, routing, e-signature, data retention and access controls with the buyer. Test keyboard and assistive-technology use across the complete process.

Accept the document and operating workflow

Machine checks and human acceptance have separate records. Current public one-sheets, the field guide and repaired agenda demonstrate document work; production volume and client outcomes require their own evidence.

Current capability PDF ↗ · Field guide PDF ↗ · Repaired agenda example ↗

Inspect the current PDF machine-validation record ↗

Download the blank document batch ledger ↗

These public files demonstrate current document work. A production-volume commitment follows representative-batch measurement, agreed capacity and human acceptance.

References for the work

Use these published resources when defining the requirements for your project.

Synthetic research sample / Version 1.0

Research and service-design plan

Question
Can a first-time resident identify and begin the correct service?
Scenario
Fictional service directory
Synthetic research sample. Source excerpt, not client delivery. Inspect the versioned JSON source ↗

Put the plan to work

Inspect the versioned source and discuss the structure of your engagement.

Inspect the related versioned sample ↗

These are planning practices, not a universal scope, legal interpretation or delivery guarantee. Agree the criteria that apply to your project.

Bring your project brief ↗